Humint Events Online: E-mail Tucker Carlson!

Wednesday, November 16, 2005

E-mail Tucker Carlson!

Tucker@msnbc.com

Let him know the why the government is complicit in 9/11.
This is from the little turds "blog":
We've never had an e-mail response like the one we got after Monday's segment with Stephen Jones, a professor in the department of physics and astronomy at Brigham Young University. Jones believes that the World Trade Center buildings were likely brought down by bombs, rather than by hijacked planes on 9-11. "Use of powerful, pre-positioned explosives in the WTC buildings would imply an 'inside job'," Jones writes in a paper available on the BYU website. "Clearly, we must find out what really caused the WTC skyscrapers to collapse as they did."

When one of my producers first told me about him, my first thought was: Stephen Jones is insane. And he may be. On the other hand, he does have a legitimate job and a responsible-sounding title. He's not living in the park, or writing me letters in crayon. How crazy could he really be? In the interest of open-mindedness, we booked him.

That was probably a mistake. Talking about 9-11 is a lot like discussing someone else's religion: You can do it, but you've got to tread carefully. Most of the time, it's best to stick to platitudes and move on. The subject is still too raw for debate, particularly here in the New York area. (The little town where I live lost six people on September 11th; the town next door lost more than 20.) Professor Jones wasn't up to the job. If you saw last night's show, you know what an uncomfortable six minutes it was. If not, I'll summarize: Jones was almost totally incapable of explaining his own ideas. By the end of the interview I understood no more about his hypothesis than when it began. He was an epically bad guest.

Yet - and here's the interesting part - he seemed to connect with a huge number of viewers. Some who e-mailed were offended that Jones would dare question the official version of 9-11. Some were confused by what he was trying to say. But the overwhelming majority wrote to thank me for my "courage" in putting him on, and to complain that we didn't give him more time to explain the conspiracy.

In other words, a lot of people seem to think it's possible that the U.S. government had a hand in bringing down the World Trade Center buildings.

Ponder that for a second: The U.S. government killed more than 3,000 of its own citizens. For no obvious reason. Then lied about it. Then invaded two other countries, killing thousands of their citizens as punishment for a crime they didn't commit.

If you really thought this - or even considered it a possibility - how could you continue to live here? You couldn't. You'd leave the United States on the next available flight and not come back. You'd have no choice. Continuing to pay taxes to a government capable of something so evil would make you complicit in the crime.

So of course most of the people who wrote to say they think the government might have been behind 9-11 don't really think the government might have been behind 9-11. For whatever reason, they just like to say so. Which as far as I'm concerned makes them phony and irresponsible.

Incidentally, we still have an open mind here on the Situation, even after Professor Stephen Jones. So if evidence ever does arise that the government lied substantially about what happened on September 11th, we'll be on it immediately. I promise.
GOTTA love that last bit: "if evidence ever does arise that the government lied substantially about what happened on September 11th, we'll be on it immediately."

LOL. What assholes.

E-mail is probably a waste of time-- these guys are not going to reveal the truth behind 9/11. BUT-- at least we can show them our numbers.

8 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I just emailed him a bunch of whatreallyhappened links. Something tells me he's gonna have ON HELLOVA FULL inbox manana! hehe :-)

1:33 AM  
Blogger spooked said...

Indeed! Thanks Rob.

7:45 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Please! Do send him ALL your links! The world needs to knwo how screwed up some people are out there and how they simply cannot accept the reality of life. Make sure you send him your thoughts on how the planes were faked as they crashed into the WTC and The Pentagon and Pennsylvania. Make sure you send him your thoughts on how because *you* don't think there was enough wreckage at the Pentagon, a plane didn't crash there. Make sure you send him your thoughts on how an aircraft should have broken up as it hit the face of the WTC, with wings and the tail not simply falling to the street. Make sure you include people like Hufschmid so we can also bring to light how the Apollo landings were faked. Make sure you send him links to Griffin and how the Pentagon's "missile defense system" was deactivated (I work there and still can't find that dang system!)

I could go on...and on and on and on, but by all means! Send him ALL your proof! The world needs to know how absolutely crazy you all are.

2:43 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Waste of time with these scumbags. The interview was an attempted hit on Jones' credibility, as was the 'blog'. Why bother interviewing Jones in the first place? Carlson tells us why. Jones is a reputable and credible source of academic dissent. He has a case. People will listen to him because he is reputable. He does not live in a park or write in crayons- as the gormless little prick tells us. Rather, Jones is a threat that has to be neutralized in a hit piece. It may not be the last. If people respond to what he has to say by actually thinking 'hey, maybe this guy has a point- I always wondered how those things came down', this is good news. Its more likely now that he will be simply ignored by the Ministry of Propaganda because he does strike a cord.

6:51 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

hey...it wouldn't truly be a party 'till the SHILL (pinch) shows up! LOL ;-)

i always wonder why people like our resident Shill hang around places where:

1) They claim they totally don't agree with, or believe anything contained within...

2) They're not at all wanted.

3) They CONSISTENTLY have NOTHING but negativity, and negative comments to add.

so...what could possibly make this person consistently hang around a place he doesn't like, and completely disagrees with??

Hmmmm....I wonder.....

11:34 PM  
Blogger spooked said...

Pinch--

All that "wacky" stuff is just details that are not necessary to prove 9/11 was an inside job. But the physical evidencve is incriminating, if you have an open mind and understand the full context of 9/11.

I didn't send any physical evidence, sorry to disappoint. This is the evidence I sent (just chosen from teh top of my head):
So, evidence for government involvement in 9/11:

1) Condoleeza Rice lying about not imagining terrorists using airplanes as missiles. This was a clear lie and a cover up, because the military ran multiple drills just on this premise before 9/11. As National Security Advisor, Rice had to know about these drills.
2) NORAD was running a live-fly hijacking drill on 9/11! This is too much of a coincidence for me, yet the media has been strangely silent about it.
3) The lack of air defenses around Washington DC when hijacked aircraft were roaming the northeast part of the US. This is criminal.
4) The lack of reaction when Bush heard the second WTC tower was hit when he was in the Florida classroom. He said NOTHING and Card just walked out. Makes no sense.
5) Why didn't Secret Service agents rush Bush out of the classroom when they knew the country was under attack. Again, this makes no sense!
6) there were many many many forewarnings of a terrorist attack picked up by the government, yet no one did anything. That is not incompetence, that is criminal.
7) General Ahmed of the Pakistani ISI wired money to Mohamed Atta before 9/11. The ISI is closely linked to the CIA, and this smells bad.
8) Two hijackers lived with an FBI informant in San Diego.
9) FBI agent Robert Wright resigned from the FBI because he said the agency refused to heed warnings of the attacks.
10) Former government counsel David Schippers said FBI agents gave him specific details of the 9/11 attacks before they happened.
11) There is the strange lack of urgency of getting Osama bin Laden, the supposed perpetrator of 9/11.
12) The evidence that the WTC towers were blown up-- NYFD reported bombs going off, the local media reported bombs going off, but it has all been covered up-- and YOU KNOW IT. The science shows the towers were demolished.
13) Hijackers took over four planes armed only with plastic knives and box-cutters, yet not one plane gave a hijack signal. How? But the government has shown no interest in this.
14) Who were the hijackers? Many of them were using fake ID. But the government has shown no interest in this.

Isn't that just CRAAAAZY?

8:22 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I wouldn't call this "evidence". Its more like your own abstract interpretive dance to the weird music you hear in your head.

Its like "chemtrails". Anyone anywhere can come up with some wacked out conspiracy theory for anything - The NY Giants beat Philadelphia today - Terrel Owens colluded with a select few of his Eagle teammates to get them to throw the game so his absence looks so much more important to team success. My toilet is leaking, caused by covert actions from Smith's Plumbing and Elctrical, to draw in additional, follow-on work. The Bush administration helped cause 9/11 to (fill in the blank).

The only aspect of this lunacy that makes it worthwhile (and why I keep reading this blog) is to keep seeing what you clowns come up with next - and almost on a daily basis you don't disappoint.

8:43 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

...and the SHILL played on...

12:50 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Powered by Blogger