Humint Events Online: Science and Planes Versus No-Planes

Wednesday, November 01, 2006

Science and Planes Versus No-Planes

Eric Salter got his crappy paper on planes being used on 9/11 published in "The Journal of 9/11 Studies".

Apparently there was supposed to be a paper published in the same issue arguing against planes, which was rejected. This is the paper that was rejected. Nothing really new there for me, but still a good summary of the no-plane evidence.

I can't see that Salter's paper is in anyway more scientific than Reynolds and Rajter's paper, and certainly Salter's paper is more severely flawed from my perspective.

"The Journal of 9/11 Studies" is a joke, in terms of being a scientific publication.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home

Powered by Blogger